Using Agroforestry to Restore Degraded Land in Suriname’s Interior
Executive Summary Suriname, a country with over 90% forest cover, plays a critical role in the global effort to preserve tropical rainforests. Nevertheless, despite this ecological richness, the interior of Suriname faces mounting threats from shifting agriculture, illicit mining operations, and unsustainable logging practices. These practices not only lead to severe land degradation, but also, over time, undermine essential ecosystem services. As a strategic response to these challenges, agroforestry offers a compelling and holistic solution. By seamlessly integrating trees, crops, and livestock systems, agroforestry provides a pathway to restore degraded lands, enhance biodiversity, and simultaneously improve local livelihoods. Therefore, this white paper outlines a detailed case for adopting agroforestry across Suriname’s interior. It also identifies context-specific models, explores implementation frameworks, evaluates investment potential, and ultimately proposes strategic recommendations for diverse stakeholders. 1. Introduction The interior regions of Suriname are experiencing a rapid acceleration in land degradation. This, in turn, places critical biodiversity, local food systems, and the livelihoods of Indigenous and Maroon communities at significant risk. Historically, traditional land-use systems helped maintain ecological equilibrium. However, in recent years, this balance has been disrupted by modern pressures such as small-scale gold mining and widespread clear-cut agriculture. As a result, formerly fertile landscapes have become depleted and fragmented. In contrast, agroforestry presents a viable and regenerative path forward. Specifically, by incorporating trees and shrubs within farming systems, agroforestry bridges the goals of environmental renewal and economic resilience. 2. Context and Problem Statement Extent of Degradation: According to both satellite imagery and local surveys, regions like Brokopondo, Sipaliwini, and Marowijne are witnessing expanding tracts of nutrient-depleted and deforested land. Primary Drivers: Chief among the drivers are slash-and-burn agriculture, mercury pollution from artisanal gold mining, and expanding infrastructure that increases access to remote forests. Consequences for Communities: As soil quality deteriorates, communities are forced to relocate their farming plots more frequently. Consequently, food insecurity worsens, and many are compelled to migrate away from traditional territories. 3. Agroforestry as a Solution As a land management system, agroforestry delivers a wide array of environmental and socio-economic benefits. Not only does it restore ecosystem function, but it also offers resilience in the face of climate variability. Notably, these systems: Restore soil fertility through organic biomass accumulation and leaf litter. Support microclimate regulation and enrich local biodiversity. Generate diverse revenue streams from fruits, nuts, timber, medicinal plants, and honey. Sequester atmospheric carbon, thereby mitigating climate change impacts. Scientific Rationale: Moreover, numerous studies from comparable ecosystems in the Amazon basin and West Africa validate that agroforestry enhances soil structure, increases water retention, and stimulates nutrient cycling within a span of just three to five years. 4. Agroforestry Models Suitable for Suriname Several agroforestry models can be effectively tailored to the Surinamese context: Improved Fallow Systems: These involve the strategic use of nitrogen-fixing species like Inga edulis alongside food crops. As a result, soils can naturally regenerate between planting cycles. Silvopasture: By combining tree planting with managed livestock grazing, this model helps control erosion while providing sustainable fodder sources. Forest Farming: This system promotes the cultivation of high-value non-timber forest products (NTFPs) such as cacao, vanilla, and traditional medicinal plants under a forest canopy. Alley Cropping: Through the alternating arrangement of crop rows and fast-growing tree species, this approach enhances both productivity and land stability. 5. Implementation Strategy Targeted Site Selection Prioritize areas already affected by mining, abandoned agricultural plots, and zones bordering protected forests. Community-Led Design Use participatory rural appraisal (PRA) to engage communities in the design of site-specific agroforestry systems. At the same time, emphasize capacity-building for youth and women, encouraging entrepreneurial agroforestry initiatives. Capacity Building and Support Establish model demonstration farms and decentralized seedling nurseries. Furthermore, collaborate with local universities and NGOs to provide ongoing training and technical expertise. Policy and Institutional Alignment Align agroforestry initiatives with national climate and forest strategies, such as the National Adaptation Plan. Secure land tenure for communities and incentivize long-term restoration efforts through policy reforms. 6. Barriers and Mitigation Measures Key Barrier Recommended Solution Limited technical knowledge Provide comprehensive extension services and training programs Insecure or unclear land tenure Pass legal frameworks that recognize and formalize community land rights Weak access to markets Foster producer cooperatives and strengthen local value chains High upfront investment requirements Deploy blended finance strategies and green bond instruments 7. Investment Opportunities Agroforestry in Suriname offers a compelling case for mission-aligned investors who seek to generate environmental, social, and financial returns. In particular: Green Bonds: These instruments channel funds into land restoration, with repayment linked to verified environmental performance. Carbon Credit Systems: Agroforestry can generate tradable credits under REDD+ or voluntary carbon markets, creating revenue while supporting climate goals. Agroforestry Enterprises: Invest in local businesses that add value to NTFPs, expanding income opportunities and promoting sustainable exports. 8. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) To ensure accountability and adaptive learning, a strong M&E framework should be implemented. Key performance indicators include: Soil health improvements, particularly increases in organic matter and erosion reduction. Enhanced agricultural yields and measurable increases in household income. Boosts in biodiversity, as indicated by species counts and habitat diversity. Community engagement levels, including participation in training and peer-to-peer knowledge transfer. 9. Recommendations To Government Agencies: Institutionalize agroforestry as a central pillar within national development and land-use strategies. Offer fiscal and technical support to catalyze early adoption and scalability. To Donors and Impact Investors: Fund innovative pilot projects with clearly defined outcomes and long-term potential. Facilitate access to capital for community-based initiatives through guarantees or concessional terms. To Local Communities: Organize into producer groups to enhance bargaining power and market access. Concurrently, preserve and apply traditional ecological knowledge to customize and strengthen agroforestry systems. 10. Conclusion At this critical juncture, Suriname must choose between continued environmental degradation and a transformative path of ecological restoration. Fortunately, agroforestry provides a dynamic solution that bridges ancestral wisdom with modern sustainability principles. With coordinated investment, sound policies, and inclusive local engagement, Suriname can unlock the potential of agroforestry to rejuvenate its interior landscapes and foster a more resilient and equitable
Using Agroforestry to Restore Degraded Land in Suriname’s Interior Read More »